Los Angeles in 1913 had a population of 465,000, and boasted of over 600 miles of graded and graveled streets, of its position as the commercial capital of southern California, and of its spacious homes. The following photographs are from Frank W. Staley’s Views of Los Angeles.
Weeping Willow, Echo ParkResidence and Park, Beverly HillsPacific Ave and Park, Long BeachHollywood ResidencesBathing Scene and Amusement Pier, VeniceBoulevard, HollywoodBroadway, north from 8th Street
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed, sign up for my newsletter, or like EP on Facebook.
Love what you're reading? Has it helped your school project or book? Consider making a small donation to keep Edwardian Promenade online and a free resource in the years to come!
Thanks for visiting!
Welcome back! Love what you're reading? Has it helped your school project or book? Consider making a small donation to keep Edwardian Promenade online and a free resource in the years to come!
3 replies on “Views of Los Angeles from 100 Years Ago”
says:hels
We absolutely HAVE to see the 1913 photos, to be able to see what the city lost (as well as gained). Look at those lovely electric trams gliding around, providing excellent public transport. Why oh why were they pulled out?
There must have been something magical, green, hopeful and peaceful about 1913 in many places. When I wrote “Glorious Days: Australia 1913” L.A wasn’t mentioned.. but it very easily could have been.
“Look at those lovely electric trams gliding around, providing excellent public transport. Why oh why were they pulled out?”
Mostly? Because they hadn’t made any actual money since, well, since those pictures were taken. And they were old and worn out (see: “Hadn’t made any money” for reason), and any time you wanted to change a route it was a major construction project rather than just drawing a new line on your schedule map. And…
…you get the idea. I *love* the P.E. and LAry and all the other trolleys that used to go around L.A. (heck, look at my name!) – I think they’re really cool. But on the whole, they lost out to better, cheaper, faster systems – buses and cars – and essentially went bankrupt. And even when the last lines were owned by the MTA, they saw that buses did the job cheaper too.
We absolutely HAVE to see the 1913 photos, to be able to see what the city lost (as well as gained). Look at those lovely electric trams gliding around, providing excellent public transport. Why oh why were they pulled out?
There must have been something magical, green, hopeful and peaceful about 1913 in many places. When I wrote “Glorious Days: Australia 1913” L.A wasn’t mentioned.. but it very easily could have been.
Thanks for the link
Hels
http://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/glorious-days-australia-1913-vida.html
“Look at those lovely electric trams gliding around, providing excellent public transport. Why oh why were they pulled out?”
Mostly? Because they hadn’t made any actual money since, well, since those pictures were taken. And they were old and worn out (see: “Hadn’t made any money” for reason), and any time you wanted to change a route it was a major construction project rather than just drawing a new line on your schedule map. And…
…you get the idea. I *love* the P.E. and LAry and all the other trolleys that used to go around L.A. (heck, look at my name!) – I think they’re really cool. But on the whole, they lost out to better, cheaper, faster systems – buses and cars – and essentially went bankrupt. And even when the last lines were owned by the MTA, they saw that buses did the job cheaper too.