<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100 Years: Alpha Kappa Alpha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/</link>
	<description>la belle epoque in our modern world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latoya</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-38800</link>
		<dc:creator>Latoya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 23:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-38800</guid>
		<description>At the end of the day Delta Sigma Theta still has to pay homage to AKA. Because if there was no AKA there would be no DST. Considering, their founders were AKA&#039;s originally. It&#039;s just a fact. And yes DST&#039;s, Alpha Kappa Alpha was apart of the women&#039;s suffrage movement. Why does DST resent AKA so much. It has been 100+ years in the name of Jesus black women, please cut the foolishness and DST get over it, your organization is second with the Mother-Alpha Kappa Alpha leading the way. 

From a black woman who is not affiliated with a sorority</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day Delta Sigma Theta still has to pay homage to AKA. Because if there was no AKA there would be no DST. Considering, their founders were AKA&#8217;s originally. It&#8217;s just a fact. And yes DST&#8217;s, Alpha Kappa Alpha was apart of the women&#8217;s suffrage movement. Why does DST resent AKA so much. It has been 100+ years in the name of Jesus black women, please cut the foolishness and DST get over it, your organization is second with the Mother-Alpha Kappa Alpha leading the way. </p>
<p>From a black woman who is not affiliated with a sorority</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Student as well</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-22547</link>
		<dc:creator>Student as well</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-22547</guid>
		<description>I am sure glad someone knows a little history at my University! Thank you Student! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure glad someone knows a little history at my University! Thank you Student! <img src='http://edwardianpromenade.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Student</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-6475</link>
		<dc:creator>Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-6475</guid>
		<description>Just FYI on an error (typo) kappa alpha theta was founded at DePauw not DuPauw and at the time the name of the university was indiana Asbury</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just FYI on an error (typo) kappa alpha theta was founded at DePauw not DuPauw and at the time the name of the university was indiana Asbury</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delta Mom</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Delta Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Happy Belated Birthday Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.! 


I love me some DST no matter who did what.
Proud to be a Delta Mom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Belated Birthday Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.! </p>
<p>I love me some DST no matter who did what.<br />
Proud to be a Delta Mom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prospect</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Prospect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-455</guid>
		<description>This is such a lovely piece, and it boggles my mind why anyone who is not affiliated with this obviously unstoppable organization would make such unresearched statements. I am not a member of either organization, but just by reading the above posts, I assume that Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. resents Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. I know this is not the case, and that one should not judge an org. by one or two members, but please remember &quot;discretion is key&quot;. Those who have no knowledge of your org. base their interpretations on you. As for the ladies of AKA, who posted above. I am impressed! To the author of the article, your piece is well-written. Thank you for taking time out to learn about a fantastic org!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a lovely piece, and it boggles my mind why anyone who is not affiliated with this obviously unstoppable organization would make such unresearched statements. I am not a member of either organization, but just by reading the above posts, I assume that Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. resents Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. I know this is not the case, and that one should not judge an org. by one or two members, but please remember &#8220;discretion is key&#8221;. Those who have no knowledge of your org. base their interpretations on you. As for the ladies of AKA, who posted above. I am impressed! To the author of the article, your piece is well-written. Thank you for taking time out to learn about a fantastic org!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pretty Girl Pearl</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Pretty Girl Pearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-381</guid>
		<description>101 Years and counting!

Nice work Sorors! ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>101 Years and counting!</p>
<p>Nice work Sorors! ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Happy Birthday Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.!  

It&#039;s unfortunate that a nice article on AKA&#039;s achievements is undermined by foolishness.  In any event, Lisa and Andrea handled it very nicely; with class.  Congratulations on 100 years of Service To All Mankind!

Karen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Birthday Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.!  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate that a nice article on AKA&#8217;s achievements is undermined by foolishness.  In any event, Lisa and Andrea handled it very nicely; with class.  Congratulations on 100 years of Service To All Mankind!</p>
<p>Karen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Soror Lisa well said, well said!  I will co sign as I too am an active Soror residing in Atlanta, Georgia.  No doubt DST&#039;s presence at the 1913 Suffrage March was formidable to say the least and in no way does this editorial deflect from that.  Actually, I love that picture of DST holding their banner at the march; I love old historic photos.

Those comments weren’t even called for so knock the chips off your shoulders anonymous and Delta Sigma Theta; strong, wrong and out of order.  I am curious as to the doubt of AKA’s membership and more importantly why you are worrying about it? 

In addition to what my Soror said, I want to mention, Julia Lathrop who I became familiar with while in college; taking “Womens History” class.  Lathrop was a staunch advocate for social reform as well as a staunch advocate during the Suffrage Movement; particularly Chicago.  Lathrop and Jane Addams were very good friends.  AKA also had ties with Julia Lathrop who is an AKA.  The Suffrage Movement is a very intriguing era more so the relations between the White Women Suffragists and the Black Women Suffragists.

So, while DST profoundly left their mark on the Suffrage Movement and in particular at the 1913 Suffrage parade in Washington, DC they did not do it alone.  Regardless, this point shouldn’t have had to be made but when non AKA’s start spouting off what AKA did or did not do, it has to be addressed.

Regards,
Team Soror Nellie Quander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soror Lisa well said, well said!  I will co sign as I too am an active Soror residing in Atlanta, Georgia.  No doubt DST&#8217;s presence at the 1913 Suffrage March was formidable to say the least and in no way does this editorial deflect from that.  Actually, I love that picture of DST holding their banner at the march; I love old historic photos.</p>
<p>Those comments weren’t even called for so knock the chips off your shoulders anonymous and Delta Sigma Theta; strong, wrong and out of order.  I am curious as to the doubt of AKA’s membership and more importantly why you are worrying about it? </p>
<p>In addition to what my Soror said, I want to mention, Julia Lathrop who I became familiar with while in college; taking “Womens History” class.  Lathrop was a staunch advocate for social reform as well as a staunch advocate during the Suffrage Movement; particularly Chicago.  Lathrop and Jane Addams were very good friends.  AKA also had ties with Julia Lathrop who is an AKA.  The Suffrage Movement is a very intriguing era more so the relations between the White Women Suffragists and the Black Women Suffragists.</p>
<p>So, while DST profoundly left their mark on the Suffrage Movement and in particular at the 1913 Suffrage parade in Washington, DC they did not do it alone.  Regardless, this point shouldn’t have had to be made but when non AKA’s start spouting off what AKA did or did not do, it has to be addressed.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Team Soror Nellie Quander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-215</guid>
		<description>First and foremost, thank you for the nice editorial on Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. in honor of the organizations 100 years of service.

Anonymous &amp; Delta Sigma Theta:

I am not sure why the negative tone in your responses or for that matter a response at all seeing as though neither of you are members of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. but it is apparent that accolades to AKA seem to rub you both the wrong way.  In any event, this is an editorial simply highlighting AKA’s achievements since inception in 1908 in which your comments are inappropriate and unnecessary for several reasons.  

First, neither of you are AKA’s.

Second, I find it interesting that you scold the blogger for not having accurate information when you two are the ones who are misinformed.  Therefore, I suggest you heed your own advice.

Third, Alpha Kappa Alpha membership stands at over 200,000 with 975 chapters worldwide.

Fourth, AKA members were very involved in the Suffrage Movement and contrary to what you believe, did participate in the 1913 Suffrage March in Washington, DC.  Jane Addams who marched in both the DC and Chicago parades was an AKA; AKA’s first Honorary Soror in 1913.  During the Suffrage era, not only did AKA’s have ties to Jane Addams but to Jeanette Rankin (briefly mentioned in AKA: In the Eye of the Beholder and Alpha Kappa Alpha: Through the Years), Addie Waites Hunton (becomes Honorary in 1933) and Charlotte Hawkins Brown (becomes an AKA in 1927).  However, AKA’s presence at the 1913 march was not to the stature of DST and not under the umbrella of AKA; AKA never claimed that it was.  

Unfortunately, in most cases the names of Black women that did participate in the parade were not recorded.  Only certain Black women achieved that level of prominence such as Ida Wells and Mary Church because of how involved they were.  The courage that DST showed at the parade was outstanding and something that I will forever be “in awe” of but DST members were not the only ones marching in the back.  On the contrary, many African American Suffrage Clubs from various states such as Chicago and New York were there but again it was never thoroughly documented for several reasons; one being the tension between the Black Women Suffragists and the White Women Suffragists.   Alpha Kappa Alpha has never made that claim nor is it claimed in this editorial.  AKA history books mention that Soror’s not only participated in the Marches but in the Suffrage Movement as a whole.   

Fifth, the Mary Church comment about her being “dismayed with AKA’s social agenda” is irrelevant to AKA.  I don’t know what agenda you or Ms. Church is or was referring to but AKA is celebrating 100 years of service so our “agenda” is intact, forever evolving and making positive impacts in the community so don’t worry about it.   The Service To All Mankind has always been the focus even when others wanted to change it and while our programs evolve to meet the current needs of the community, the spirit, focus and integrity never changes. Thus, out of respect for the legacy of Mary Church, who I believe became an Honorary Delta; I will leave it at that.

Lastly, as for your article references, again irrelevant seeing as though no one was disputing and or commenting on DST.   DST’s participation in the 1913 Suffrage parade has never been denied by Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. or anyone else.  So in the future, please don’t speak on behalf of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.  as I am sure you would be perturbed if a non Delta spoke on behalf of DST with inaccurate information to boot.

Sincerely,

Lisa (A proud and active member of the 1st and Finest)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First and foremost, thank you for the nice editorial on Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. in honor of the organizations 100 years of service.</p>
<p>Anonymous &amp; Delta Sigma Theta:</p>
<p>I am not sure why the negative tone in your responses or for that matter a response at all seeing as though neither of you are members of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. but it is apparent that accolades to AKA seem to rub you both the wrong way.  In any event, this is an editorial simply highlighting AKA’s achievements since inception in 1908 in which your comments are inappropriate and unnecessary for several reasons.  </p>
<p>First, neither of you are AKA’s.</p>
<p>Second, I find it interesting that you scold the blogger for not having accurate information when you two are the ones who are misinformed.  Therefore, I suggest you heed your own advice.</p>
<p>Third, Alpha Kappa Alpha membership stands at over 200,000 with 975 chapters worldwide.</p>
<p>Fourth, AKA members were very involved in the Suffrage Movement and contrary to what you believe, did participate in the 1913 Suffrage March in Washington, DC.  Jane Addams who marched in both the DC and Chicago parades was an AKA; AKA’s first Honorary Soror in 1913.  During the Suffrage era, not only did AKA’s have ties to Jane Addams but to Jeanette Rankin (briefly mentioned in AKA: In the Eye of the Beholder and Alpha Kappa Alpha: Through the Years), Addie Waites Hunton (becomes Honorary in 1933) and Charlotte Hawkins Brown (becomes an AKA in 1927).  However, AKA’s presence at the 1913 march was not to the stature of DST and not under the umbrella of AKA; AKA never claimed that it was.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately, in most cases the names of Black women that did participate in the parade were not recorded.  Only certain Black women achieved that level of prominence such as Ida Wells and Mary Church because of how involved they were.  The courage that DST showed at the parade was outstanding and something that I will forever be “in awe” of but DST members were not the only ones marching in the back.  On the contrary, many African American Suffrage Clubs from various states such as Chicago and New York were there but again it was never thoroughly documented for several reasons; one being the tension between the Black Women Suffragists and the White Women Suffragists.   Alpha Kappa Alpha has never made that claim nor is it claimed in this editorial.  AKA history books mention that Soror’s not only participated in the Marches but in the Suffrage Movement as a whole.   </p>
<p>Fifth, the Mary Church comment about her being “dismayed with AKA’s social agenda” is irrelevant to AKA.  I don’t know what agenda you or Ms. Church is or was referring to but AKA is celebrating 100 years of service so our “agenda” is intact, forever evolving and making positive impacts in the community so don’t worry about it.   The Service To All Mankind has always been the focus even when others wanted to change it and while our programs evolve to meet the current needs of the community, the spirit, focus and integrity never changes. Thus, out of respect for the legacy of Mary Church, who I believe became an Honorary Delta; I will leave it at that.</p>
<p>Lastly, as for your article references, again irrelevant seeing as though no one was disputing and or commenting on DST.   DST’s participation in the 1913 Suffrage parade has never been denied by Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. or anyone else.  So in the future, please don’t speak on behalf of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.  as I am sure you would be perturbed if a non Delta spoke on behalf of DST with inaccurate information to boot.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Lisa (A proud and active member of the 1st and Finest)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delta Sigma Theta</title>
		<link>http://edwardianpromenade.com/social-history/100-years-alpha-kappa-alpha/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Delta Sigma Theta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://edwardianpromenade.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-150</guid>
		<description>It is not true that AKA were asked and marched in the 1913 March for Suffrage.  Mary Church Terrell was dismayed at the AKAs early social agenda in the 1912/1913 timeframe.  Mary Church Terrell had no respect for AKA in the 1912/1913 timeframe and was greatly disappointed in their social agenda.  In all of Mary Church Terrell written documents she states that she is disappointed in social sororities.  The  Washington Times, The Afro-american Newspapers and especially the 
Black newspapers stated that only Delta Sigma Theta Marched for Women Suffrage in 1913.  Also check out the artice in the Crisis Magazine in 1913 that mentions that DST was the only sororoity to march.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not true that AKA were asked and marched in the 1913 March for Suffrage.  Mary Church Terrell was dismayed at the AKAs early social agenda in the 1912/1913 timeframe.  Mary Church Terrell had no respect for AKA in the 1912/1913 timeframe and was greatly disappointed in their social agenda.  In all of Mary Church Terrell written documents she states that she is disappointed in social sororities.  The  Washington Times, The Afro-american Newspapers and especially the<br />
Black newspapers stated that only Delta Sigma Theta Marched for Women Suffrage in 1913.  Also check out the artice in the Crisis Magazine in 1913 that mentions that DST was the only sororoity to march.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

