Recent Posts

Have EP delivered to your inbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Join Evangeline's News & Notes

* = required field

powered by MailChimp!

Archives

Categories

Meta

Archive for December, 2009

ABC Ta ShopAt the beginning of the nineteenth century, meals could be obtained at chop houses, coaching inns, hotels, and coffee houses, yet all these ways of eating were deemed unsuitable for respectable women, who generally ate at home. This situation changed in the 1860s with the arrival of better railway hotels, who welcomed women in the dining rooms, and in the late 1880s, with the appearance of restaurants such as the Holborn, the Criterion, and the Gaiety. Women were welcome also in tea and coffee shops, of which began to appear in London in the 1870s when several temperance societies opened them. By 1879, London contained 100 such establishments, many of which offered food and entertainment. However, those owned by temperance societies were often mismanaged and of poor quality, and were relatively short-lived.

Inside a Tea ShopWhat did survive, was the Aërated Bread Company or A.B.C., which was founded in 1862 by Dr. John Dauglish. Though originally founded to mass produce healthy, additive-free breads using a new bread leavening technology invented by Dauglish, the company found its name on its famous tea-shops, of which the first was opened in 1864 in the courtyard of London’s Fenchurch Street Railway Station. Soon, tea rooms opened up all over, and a rival to the A.B.C. firm arrived as well: that owned by Joseph Lyons, who opened his first tea shop on Piccadilly in 1894, and the first of his famous Corner Houses 15 years later. These establishments not only offered afternoon tea, but provided, for the first time, a place that an unchaperoned young lady could visit with her friends and maintain her reputation. Should she so wish, she could even be accompanied by a young gentleman.

demonstrating the tangoTea rooms were opened in both London’s leading hotels and London’s leading department stores, where ladies were provided with a space in which to rest, to take tea, and to write the copious letters integral to a woman’s busy day. A tea room was also a most respectable manner in which to make a living. For ladies who had fallen on hard times, or even aristocratic women wanting to express their independence (and earn a little money), tea rooms were an extremely lucrative business. Tea rooms were also significant to the growth of female independence and a separate feminine sphere, and many of them were a hotbed of agitation for women’s suffrage. By 1910, the higher-end tea rooms became a little more sophisticated: palm court orchestras were added, the food became a little more cosmopolitan, cocktails were served, space for dancing was created, and afternoon tea was transformed into thé dansant.

Further Reading:
An economic history of London, 1800-1914 by Michael Ball & David Sunderland
The Making of the Modern British Diet by Derek J. Oddy & Derek S. Miller
Plenty and Want: A Social History of Food in England from 1815 to the Present Day by John Burnett
1900s Lady by Kate Caffrey
Shopping in Style: London from the Restoration to Edwardian Elegance by Alison Adburgham

Posted by Evangeline Holland • Filed under Business, Food, London, Women • Tagged as Tags: , , , ,

‘Palm Beach County at 100′ reveals details of the Gilded Age on island

For Jan Tuckwood, editor of the new book Palm Beach County at 100: Our History, Our Home, one of the most surprising things about the history of Palm Beach was its use of advanced technology at the end of the 19th century.

“Figulus used a windmill and solar power to provide energy to the estate. I didn’t know they used advanced technology to run that estate,” Tuckwood said.

The estate, owned by C.W. Bingham in 1894, was also the first to be built on the ocean side of Palm Beach at a time when most residents lived on what is now the Intracoastal side.

Glittering treasures from Cartier’s 100 years in America

“King of jewelers and jeweler of kings” is how Great Britain’s Edward VII once described Cartier, the French jewelry design firm whose name is synonymous with understated elegance, superior craftsmanship, technical virtuosity and, of course, luxury.

The monarch’s hearty endorsement, offered during the Belle Époque at the turn of the 20th century, would be seconded by the patronage of a host of wealthy socialites, countesses and heiresses. There was Barbara Hutton, a bevy of Vanderbilts, assorted expatriate European royalty like the Duchess of Windsor and Princess Grace of Monaco and Hollywood glitterati from Liz Taylor, Vivien Leigh and Fred Astaire to Gloria Swanson, the faded movie queen in “Sunset Boulevard.”

At last, the rest of us have a chance to get up close and personal with jewels possessed by the fortunate few.

Holidays along the Hudson

Nestled between New York’s Hudson River and the Connecticut border, the magnificent estates of Dutchess County sit, decked out in true holiday style with comfortable, warm glows emanating from their Gilded Age-era rooms. These palatial homes once belonged to and hosted some of the most talked-about people of their time – Mills, Vanderbilts and Roosevelts alike.

During this holiday season, visitors are welcomed into a historic celebration of the season with festivals and parades in towns and villages aglow with the holiday spirit in the shadows of these giant homes of once prominent financiers and industrialists.

‘Editor & Publisher’ Bites the Dust

The death announcement of the venerable Editor and Publisher magazine last week is the latest body blow to the institution of print newspapers. E&P was founded in the height of the Gilded Age in 1884 to assist in the information explosion that attended the Industrial Revolution as telegraph and telephone lines began sewing the planet into a dizzying network of human communications. Adopting its E&P name at the turn of the century, it refereed the fierce competition between Hearst and Pulitzer for the growth of their daily newspapers.

In ‘Misalliance,’ Shaw examines the end of an era

Sometimes a small plane crash is just a plane crash — or, in a Bernard Shaw play, it might represent a brash new era smashing into the old ways of doing things.

As genteel, late-Victorian England behavioral constrictions gave way to modern Edwardian ideas, people were naturally resistant to the changes. Shaw was only too happy to portray stuffy societal norms being upended in his 1910 satire, “Misalliance.”

The Pearl Theatre’s zestful off-Broadway production fully embraces all the humorous aspects of Shaw’s writing. This “Misalliance” is a talkative play, filled with wit and energy, yet also laden with farce and slapstick.

Cortes Museum revives Edwardian Christmas tradition

Christmastime in the Edwardian era of 100 years ago was celebrated in a much simpler, more homespun manner than in the extravagant style of today.

Children of “La Belle Epoque” usually received only one gift, often a doll, teddy bear or homemade toy. Stockings were filled with fruit, nuts and small candies.

Singing songs and playing games was all the entertainment adults needed after the goose and the plum pudding had been eaten.

This year, the Cortes Island Museum and Archives Society will be reviving the charming Edwardian custom of sending Christmas greetings to friends and family by postcard.

Anglophile Alerts: Win a Sherlock Holmes Themed London Holiday from Visit Britain

Visit Britain has partnered with the makers of the movie, Visit London and the Radisson Edwardian hotel group to sponsor a lovely Sherlock Holmes themed vacation contest.

The prize for two includes:

  • Economy airline tickets for two from the U.S. to London, England.
  • Four nights hotel accommodation for two, including breakfast daily at one of Radisson Edwardian’s luxurious London hotels. Radisson Edwardian has a collection of individual hotels in London and Manchester, Radisson Edwardian Hotels range from bijou boutique to large-scale luxe.
  • A walking tour of Sherlock Holmes London
  • Dinner for two at the Sherlock Holmes Pub in London
  • Entrance tickets for two to the Sherlock Holmes Museum in London

Before His Famous Portraits, Sargent Looked to the Sea

John Singer Sargent may have crossed oceans, but he was hardly a marine painter. This expatriate American artist (1856-1925) will always be remembered for his portraits, which charmed and flattered Gilded Age arrivistes on both sides of the ocean. So the theme of “Sargent and the Sea,” in its final weeks at the Corcoran Gallery of Art here, intrigues. Did the well-born and even-tempered painter have a rugged nautical side, or nurture fantasies of roiled, Turneresque waters?

Posted by Evangeline Holland • Filed under Headline • Tagged as Tags: , ,

The “Irish Question” dominated British politics for the majority of the nineteenth century. No other issue tore families, friends, and otherwise friendly political opponents apart than “Home Rule.” The seeds for this conflict were sown long before the nineteenth century, stretching back to the 17th century, when Oliver Cromwell, who detested detested Roman Catholicism and believed that the Irish could never be trusted, sent his New Model Army and coerce the Irish into obedience. The army laid siege to the island, the most brutal being that waged on the towns of Wexford and Drogheda, where defenders of the towns were summarily executed. Cromwell also believed the best way to bring Ireland to heel in the long term, was to ‘export’ children from Ireland to the sugar plantations in the West Indies, so that Ireland would suffer from a long term population loss, making it less of a threat to mainland Britain.

Anglo-Irish tensions were further exacerbated by the presence of the “Protestant Ascendancy,” or the “Ascendancy,” who were comprised of the Protestant English landowners who received large swaths of land from the Crown after a series of unsuccessful revolts against English rule caused much Irish land to be confiscated by the Crown. English soldiers and traders became the new ruling class, as its richer members were elevated to the Irish House of Lords and eventually controlled the Irish House of Commons. This process was facilitated and formalized in the legal system after 1691 by the passing of various Penal Laws, which discriminated against Irish Catholics and non-Anglican Protestants deemed “Dissenters.” Though the Ascendancy lost much of its overt political and social clout by the early 19th century, the “abolition of the Irish parliament was followed by economic decline in Ireland, and widespread emigration from among the ruling class to the new center of power in London, which increased the number of absentee landlords.” The Potato Famine of 1848-1852 exposed the vulnerability of Irish tenant farmers, and as a consequence, the British Parliament was moved to pass a number of acts to bolster the Irish economy. But these belated Acts did little to counteract the centuries of absentee landlord abuses, nor the history of British oppression.

The life of an Irish tenant farmers was difficult. Land prices in Ireland were high–sometimes 80-100% higher than in England–and those who leased land from an absentee landlord, rented out small parcels of land to those who paid to farm it. Each estate leased out was divided into the smallest possible parcels of land and many families who worked the land had only half-an-acre to live off. There were no rules controlling the work of those who had leased land from absentee landlords. They worked in conjunction with the Royal Irish Constabulary and it was the RIC and Army which enforced evictions if needed. There were three systems in place which forced Irish farmers into the endless cycle of debt:

Rundale: a system whereby land rented to a person or persons was scattered throughout an estate. Therefore, it was very time consuming to travel to each parcel of land. The argument given for using this system was that everyone got a chance of getting at least some good land to farm. One man in Donegal had 42 pieces of land throughout one managed estate.

Hanging Gale: a system whereby a new tenant was allowed to delay his payment of rent for 6 to 8 months from the start of renting the land. Therefore, he was permanently in debt and had no security.

Conacre: a system whereby the landlord/manager prepared the land and then the tenant moved in. The tenant was then allowed to pay part of his rent using the crops he had grown. If there was a bad harvest, then he had no crops to pay part of his rent. Therefore, he was gambling that he would get a good harvest. In 1845 to 1847, this was a disaster.

Dissent spilled over in the 1840s and 1850s with the rise of the Young Ireland party. They believed the only solution for Ireland was complete independence: Home Rule. After a failed attack on the government, Young Ireland’s most prominent leaders, James Stephens and John O’Mahony, fled for Paris. O’Mahoney later found his way to America where he stirred up the ire of Irish-Americans to create the Fenian Brotherhood. The Fenians planned a number of rebellions and uprisings, and though initially their causes garnered much sympathy, after December 1867, when several Londoners were killed when a bomb planted by the Fenians exploded at Clerkenwell Prison, there was a wave of anti-Irish feeling in London and elsewhere in England.

Prior to his taking up the cudgel for Home Rule, William Ewart Gladstone’s political career was distinguished but somewhat ordinary. In 1867, Lord Russell retired and Gladstone became a leader of the Liberal Party, shortly thereafter becoming Prime Minister where he remained in the office until 1874. According to wikipedia:

In the 1860s and 1870s, Gladstonian Liberalism was characterised by a number of policies intended to improve individual liberty and loosen political and economic restraints. First was the minimization of public expenditure on the premise that the economy and society were best helped by allowing people to spend as they saw fit. Secondly, his foreign policy aimed at promoting peace to help reduce expenditures and taxation and enhance trade. Thirdly, laws that prevented people from acting freely to improve themselves were reformed.

During Gladstone’s rise, there also arose Ireland’s most intelligent and charismatic leader, one whom many on both sides of the political spectrum could have swayed the tide of Home Rule: Charles Stewart Parnell. Born into the gentry and, surprisingly, of American stock via his mother, he rose swiftly through the ranks of politics, gaining fame during the 1870s when he refuted the claims that Fenians had been behind the murders in Manchester. His defense gained him the attention of the Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB), a physical force Irish organisation that had staged the rebellion in 1867, and Parnell began to cultivate Fenians from America and Britain. By the 1880s, Parnell had become the face of Irish Nationalism, and so popular was he, during his tour of Toronto, an associate dubbed him the “uncrowned king of Ireland.”

By the time of Gladstone’s Second and Third Ministries, he became aligned with the pro-Home Rule movement. Gladstone, impressed by Parnell, had become personally committed to granting Irish home rule in 1885. With his famous three-hour Irish Home Rule speech Gladstone sought to convince Parliament to “pass the Irish Government Bill 1886, and grant Home Rule to Ireland in honor rather than being compelled to do so one day in humiliation.” The bill was defeated in the Commons by 30 votes. This split the Liberal (Whig) Party, and led by Lord Hartington (later the Duke of Devonshire, whose brother was murdered by Irish nationalists at Phoenix Park in 1886) and Joseph Chamberlain, the party formed a political alliance with the Conservatives in opposition to Irish Home Rule.

From then on, the “Irish Question” was fought bitterly in the House of Commons, and politicians were not afraid to resort to various deceptions such as forgeries, bribes, dissenting anonymous pamphlets, etc. One of these backdoor deals is rumored to have resulted in the sudden petition for divorce by Captain O’Shea, the husband of Parnell’s longtime love, Katherine, with whom he had three children. The divorce scandal stunted his political career, and though he remained popular, his character was tarnished. The fight for Home Rule marched on, and prior to the Great War, two more Home Rule bills were introduced in 1892 and 1914 to a crushing defeat (though the 1914 bill was interrupted by WWI and the Easter Rising). Though the issue of Home Rule was settled violently and bloodily, it cast a pall over British politics and was the first sign of a weakness in the armor that was the British Empire.

Further Reading:
Home Rule: an Irish history, 1800-2000‎ by Alvin Jackson
Seventy Years Young by Countess Fingall
Gladstone: A Biography by Roy Jenkins
The Laurel and the Ivy: The Story of Charles Stewart Parnell and Irish Nationalism by Robert Kee
The IRB: The Irish Republican Brotherhood, from the Land League to Sinn Fein by Owen Mcgee
Handbook of Home rule, being articles on the Irish question by James Bryce
Ireland in the Nineteenth Century
Irish Home Rule Bill

Posted by Evangeline Holland • Filed under great britain, Politics • Tagged as Tags: , , ,

« Older Entries

Currently Reading

Sewalongs, Blogathons, &c

Edwardians!'s currently-reading book montage
Edwardians! 32 members
A place for discussion and fun about books set in the Edwardian era and books published during the e...

Books we're currently reading

The Visits of Elizabeth The Visits of Elizabeth
by Elinor Glyn
Start date: March 15, 2012



View this group on Goodreads »

Affiliates